Israel's Reaction to Anti-Semitism on Campus

by HERBERT LONDON May 8, 2012

At long last an attempt is being made to curtail blatant anti-Semitic commentary at American universities. The Israel Law Center warns that universities "may be liable for massive damage" if they fail to prevent anti-Semitism on campus.

The center sent hundreds of letters to university presidents drawing a line in the sand. This Israel civil rights center is carrying out this campaign in response to an alarming number of incidents against Jewish and Israeli students at U.S. universities.

A center's lawyer, Nitsana Darshan-Leitner said, "Anti-Israel rallies and events frequently exceed legitimate criticism of Israel and cross the line into blatant anti-Semitism, resulting in hateful attacks against Jews." A student at Rutgers, to cite, one example, said he was called "a racist Zionist pig" in a public Facebook posting. That comment was made when the student questioned a Student Assembly decision to donate money to the Palestine Children's Relief Fund, a nonprofit organization with ties to the Holy Land Foundation, a foundation that has funded Hamas - a recognized terrorist organization.

University officials noted that free speech provisions militate against disciplinary action; clearly

a case can and should be made for the free and open exchange of ideas on campus. In fact, every provision should be made to foster free speech. However, intimidation is another matter. Using methods to stifle free speech is the overarching issue. As George Santayana noted, "The first duty of the tolerant person is to be intolerant to intolerance."

Ms. Leitner contends that "perpetrators of hate" are exploiting academic freedom and First Amendment provisions to create an environment of intimidation, one that prevents Jews from exercising their free speech.  

Presumably the warning distributed by the center will prompt U.S. colleges and universities to take appropriate action against the growing problem of campus hate.

A former Brandeis student Hershel Hartz maintains that universities have a double standard in which anti-Semitism is protected as free speech while other designated ethnicities are scrupulously protected from discriminatory acts.

The center letter also points to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project which held it illegal to provide support to a terrorist organization, even for supposed humanitarian purposes (a clear reference to the Rutgers program).

The center's notice sets the stage for a responsible reaction to the rash of anti-Semitic actions on American campuses. As I see it, it is about time.

 

Herbert London is a Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute and the President of the London Center for Policy Research. He is president emeritus of Hudson Institute and author of the book The Transformational Decade (University Press of America). 

 


blog comments powered by Disqus

'Irony is dead': Ready for merciless mockery of wealth-basher Paul Krugman's cushy new gig?

April 16, 2014  01:53 PM

Nice work if you can get it.

Brit Hume marvels at 'proud God doubter' Nanny Bloomberg's latest absurdity

April 16, 2014  12:26 PM

"What on earth ..."

Wonder why this New Republic writer thinks paying taxes is easy? This is his first year doing so himself.

April 16, 2014  07:45 AM

Yet another liberal with no real-life experience telling everyone else how to live their lives.

Donald Rumsfeld has 'absolutely no idea' if his tax return is accurate

April 15, 2014  07:34 PM

Along with his tax return, Donald Rumsfeld filed his annual letter to the IRS asking why the tax code is so complex that no one knows if they’re paying the correct amount. “The tax code is so complex and the forms are so complicated, that I know that I cannot have any confidence that I […]

Show us the money! Homer Hickam wants people to see where their tax dollars go

April 15, 2014  06:07 PM

Let's have some transparency!

FSM Archives

More in PUBLICATIONS ( 1 OF 25 ARTICLES )